Postsoviet's Blog

Legalisation of the Russian capitals in the West – it is good, or it is bad.

Posted in аnalytics by postsoviet on May 31, 2009

As the Opel belongs to General Motors its bankruptcy becomes almost inevitable. And as it is workplaces for many and many thousand government of Germany and a Opel urgently search for the investor. Really there are offers only from Italian Fiat and Canadian Magna. Here this Most Canadian Magna couple of years back like was got by Deripaska, then the truth like as has lost this acquisition as could not pay off. But judging by that Magna acts in common with the Savings Bank and actually on Savings Bank money probably Deripaska has not absolutely lost this Magny or has lost in general in favour of the Savings Bank.

Germans probably will make a choice in favour of Magny, it obviously is more generous. I think behind Russian money unlike Fiatovsky costs not only or even not so much economic motivation, therefore they and are ready to pay obviously more.

Not so long ago also another Russian to nobody the known company the Virtual Sky has enclosed 200 million dollars in Facebook.

To tell the truth well it or is bad I has not understood yet. Certainly for rising from knees it is a subject of special pride. But in practice there is a real process of a conclusion of the capital of Russia. As I understand it the way of legalisation of the stolen riches most preferred by Russian. Itself you understand that in Russia to this money it is not becomes absolutely cosy. As in case of instability growth it is impossible to exclude mode changes it will be impossible to exclude as itself you understand also new repartition of the property. And will reach factory in Germany much more difficultly, than to any Kansko-Achinsk industrial complex.

Thus I repeat definitive opinion on a subject well it or it is bad at me is not present. This money at least does not supply the Russian militaristic complex, is not put in pipes which continue to rust and networks which continue to decay. I also think that at a ruling mode much less possibilities to compel owners of this money we will tell to finance disorders in Tbilisi or terrorist modes in Sukhumi and Tskhinvali.

Certainly I at all do not exclude, that it is and there is money of present Russian governors and even most likely so it and is. But all the same in my opinion it means more likely, what even it in Russia self comes first than a notorious rising from knees.

As it will affect a policy of Germany I to tell the truth is not assured. And how acquisition by Abramovich Chelsi has affected a policy of Great Britain? In my opinion in any way. In this sense I consider more likely that German money in Russia influences this policy, than Russian money in Germany more.

Something similar occurs after all and in Georgia. For example present disorders in Georgia are financed not by Russian investors in Georgia, and Georgian “businessmen” in Russia.

Analytics DARBAZi.iNFO

http://darbazi.info/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1595:2009-05-30-17-07-06&catid=2:2008-12-28-03-33-39&Itemid=5